Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Perception of Direct‐To‐Consumer Genetic Testing and Direct‐To‐Consumer Advertising of Genetic Tests among Members of a Large Managed Care Organization

26 Jan 2012

Abstract excerpt

This small qualitative study was designed to determine possible attitudes toward and understanding of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing among members of a large managed care organization, and whether differences might exist between population groups. Ten focus groups were conducted by population type (high risk, White, African American, Hispanic/Latino) to determine knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Biotechnology and Related Fields
Share to BRCA gene mutations in cancer

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 22278218
DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9477-3

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Perception of Direct‐To‐Consumer Genetic Testing and Direct‐To‐Consumer Advertising of Genetic Tests among Members of a Large Managed Care OrganizationPMID 22278218Read ↗

Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct‐to‐Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing ExperienceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: perceptions, problems, and policy responses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

State of play in direct-to-consumer genetic testing for lifestyle-related diseases: market, marketing content, user experiences and regulation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Primary care physicians' awareness, experience and opinions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of disease risk probability and disease type on interest in clinic-based versus direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer testing: if consumers are not anxious, why are policymakers?Semantic proximity Read ↗

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 409: Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Genetic TestingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Experiences and attitudes of hereditary cancer screening patients in a consumer directed testing model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Racial minority group interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing: findings from the PGen studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Outcomes from a Novel Approach to Studying Consumer Genetic Testing for Germline Cancer and Cardiovascular Risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Anxiety delivered direct-to-consumer: are we asking the right questions about the impacts of DTC genetic testing?Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.