Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Direct-to-consumer testing: if consumers are not anxious, why are policymakers?

Human genetics - 1 Jul 2011

Caulfield Timothy

Abstract excerpt

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing continues to receive significant attention from both the popular press and policymakers. While the demand for these services has not, to date, been significant, it nevertheless seems likely that more and more individuals will be accessing DTC services. As a result, commentators have suggested that the DTC industry requires more oversight. A common rationale for policy action is...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Anxiety
Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Share to Genetic Testing

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Health Behavior

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 21479954
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-011-0987-8

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 1 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Direct-to-consumer testing: if consumers are not anxious, why are policymakers?PMID 21479954Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: perceptions, problems, and policy responses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Anxiety delivered direct-to-consumer: are we asking the right questions about the impacts of DTC genetic testing?Semantic proximity Read ↗

State of play in direct-to-consumer genetic testing for lifestyle-related diseases: market, marketing content, user experiences and regulation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Direct‐to‐consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Consumer perceptions of direct-to-consumer personalized genomic risk assessments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of Direct‐to‐Consumer Genetic Tests on Health Behaviour and Anxiety: A Survey of Consumers and Potential ConsumersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: access and marketing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: An assessment of genetic counselors' knowledge and beliefsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: Where and How Does Genetic Counseling Fit?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct‐to‐Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing ExperienceSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests and Canadian Genetic Counselors: A Pilot Exploration of Professional Roles in Response to Novel BiotechnologiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: reliable or risky?Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.