Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Experiences and attitudes of hereditary cancer screening patients in a consumer directed testing model.

Patient education and counseling - 1 Mar 2021

Greve V, Garner M, Odom K, Cooper S J, East K M

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Since 2015, the Information is Power initiative has offered free and reduced cost hereditary cancer screening to the North Alabama population with a consumer-initiated model. Patients received pre-test and post-test education through a genetic counseling video. Positive results also received a call from a genetic counselor. OBJECTIVE: We surveyed past Information is Power patients to assess if video...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Alabama
Share to Early Detection of Cancer
Share to Genetic Counseling

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Neoplasms

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33715773
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.10.014

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Experiences and attitudes of hereditary cancer screening patients in a consumer directed testing model.PMID 33715773Read ↗

The Experiences and Needs of Individuals with a Variant of Uncertain Significance on Genetic Tests for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes:A Grounded Theory Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Primary care provider practices, attitudes, and confidence with hereditary cancer risk assessment and testing: A mixed methods study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: a case study and practical recommendations for “genomic counseling”.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Outcomes from a Novel Approach to Studying Consumer Genetic Testing for Germline Cancer and Cardiovascular Risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Breast Cancer Genetic Testing Experience: Probing the Potential Utility of an Online Decision Aid in Risk Perception and Decision MakingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Next-Generation Service Delivery: A Scoping Review of Patient Outcomes Associated with Alternative Models of Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing for Hereditary CancerSemantic proximity Read ↗

Perceptions and care Recommendations from Previvors: Qualitative analysis of female BRCA1/2 mutation Carriers’ experience with genetic testing and counselingSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Impact of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing on Patient and Provider.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Psychosocial experiences and outcomes for individuals with breast cancer after mainstream genetic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Understanding patient and provider perceptions and expectations of genomic medicine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Primary care providers' cancer genetic testing-related knowledge, attitudes, and communication behaviors: A systematic review and research agenda.Semantic proximity Read ↗

IMProving care After inherited Cancer Testing (IMPACT) study: protocol of a randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of two interventions designed to improve cancer risk management and family communication of genetic test results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.