Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of the US and Australian cystic fibrosis registries: the impact of newborn screening.

Pediatrics - 1 Feb 2012

Martin Bradley, Schechter Michael S, Jaffe Adam, Cooper Peter, Bell Scott C, Ranganathan Sarath

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: National data registries for cystic fibrosis (CF) enable comparison of health statistics between countries. We examined the US and Australian CF data registries to compare demographics, clinical practice and outcome measures. METHODS: We compared the 2003 US and Australian registries. Differences in pulmonary and growth outcomes were assessed by creating models controlling for...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Australia
Share to Benchmarking
Share to Cross-Cultural Comparison

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Feasibility Studies

Share to Forced Expiratory Volume

Share to Neonatal Screening

Share to Outcome Assessment, Health Care

Share to Registries

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 22250024
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-0567

Genes

FEV

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-05.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of the US and Australian cystic fibrosis registries: the impact of newborn screening.PMID 22250024Read ↗

Outcomes of infants born during the first 9 years of CF newborn screening in the United States: successes and the need for improvementSemantic proximity Read ↗

Cystic fibrosis across Europe: EuroCareCF analysis of demographic data from 35 countries.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Newborn screening alone insufficient to improve pulmonary outcomes for cystic fibrosis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Perinatal Outcomes in Cystic Fibrosis Women: Data From the Italian Cystic Fibrosis Registry.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Neonatal screening programme for CF: Results from the Irish Comparative Outcomes Study (ICOS).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Late Diagnosis in the Era of Universal Newborn Screening Negatively Affects Short- and Long-Term Growth and Health Outcomes in Infants with Cystic Fibrosis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Changing incidence of cystic fibrosis in Wisconsin, USA.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Optimization of the French cystic fibrosis newborn screening programme by a centralized tracking process.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes for women with Cystic Fibrosis: a UK population-based cross-sectional study, 2003-2017Semantic proximity Read ↗

Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis is beneficial even in the context of modern treatment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Demographics of the UK cystic fibrosis population: implications for neonatal screening.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Variation in cystic fibrosis newborn screening algorithms in the United States.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.