Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparing thaw survival, implantation and live birth rates from cryopreserved zygotes, embryos and blastocysts

1 Jan 2011

Abstract excerpt

CONTEXT: Most in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs employ embryo cryopreservation to enhance pregnancies from a single ovarian stimulation. More embryos are created, some of which are not transferred to the uterus immediately, generating a need for improved cryopreservation protocols. One protocol may involve growing embryos to a further stage of development, allowing only embryos with proven developmental...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 21772736
DOI: 10.4103/0974-1208.82356

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparing thaw survival, implantation and live birth rates from cryopreserved zygotes, embryos and blastocystsPMID 21772736Read ↗

Cumulative live birth rates after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in the first treatment cycleSemantic proximity Read ↗

Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?Semantic proximity Read ↗

No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Pregnancy Outcomes for Single Frozen-thawed Blastocyst Transfer of Day 5 and Day 6 With Different Quality: a Large Matched-cohort StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Over Ten-Cell Good Embryo Transfers on Day Three have Equivalent Clinical Outcomes with Those of Eight-Cell Embryos in Female Patients Aged ≤35 Years: A Retrospective Cohort StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of Day 3 cell number on pregnancy outcomes in vitrified-thawed single blastocyst transfer cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Twice vitrification-warming procedures has no effect on frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reduced live birth rate after frozen compared to fresh single poor cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes following fresh and electively frozen single blastocyst transfer in natural cycle and clomiphene-stimulated IVF cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical outcomes following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers with blastocysts derived from different cell numbers on day 3: a retrospective cohort studySemantic proximity Read ↗

The application and impact of cryopreservation of early cleavage stage embryos in assisted reproductionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Frozen-thawed embryos generated from successful fresh IVF cycles have higher potential for favorable outcome than frozen-thawed embryos obtained from unsuccessful fresh cycles: A retrospective cohortSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.