Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of methods of estimating variance components in pigs.

Journal of animal science - 1 Apr 1991

Keele J W, Long T E, Johnson R K

Abstract excerpt

Components of variance due to average effects of genes (sigma 2g), environmental effects common to littermates (sigma 2c), and environmental effects peculiar to individual pigs (sigma 2e) were estimated (--) by the Pseudo Expectation Approach (PE). Data were litter size (LS), backfat (BF; centimeter) and ADG (kilograms/day) collected from the Nebraska Gene Pool swine population between 1967 and 1986. Mean square...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adipose Tissue
Share to Analysis of Variance
Share to Computer Simulation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Variation

Share to Models, Biological

Share to Phenotype

Share to Regression Analysis

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 2071508
DOI: 10.2527/1991.6941428x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of methods of estimating variance components in pigs.PMID 2071508Read ↗

Animal model estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for litter size and weight, growth, and backfat in closed seedstock populations of large white and Landrace swine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Variance component estimates for alternative litter size traits in swine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Efficiency of an approximate animal model for maternal and direct genetic effects of litter size in swine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic parameters and trends for litter traits in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic co-variance functions for live weight, feed intake, and efficiency measures in growing pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic correlations between lean growth and litter traits in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimation of dominance variance for live body weight in a crossbred population of pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selective genotyping and phenotypic data inclusion strategies of crossbred progeny for combined crossbred and purebred selection in swine breeding.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Investigating the impact of non-additive genetic effects in the estimation of variance components and genomic predictions for heat tolerance and performance traits in crossbred and purebred pig populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Bias in variance component estimation in swine crossbreeding schemes using selective genotyping and phenotyping strategies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimates of genetic parameters among scale activity scores, growth, and fatness in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.