Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial.

doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0839

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Topics Community

Back to search

Article

Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology - 20 Mar 2010

Kuhl Christiane, Weigel Stefanie, Schrading Simone, Arand Birke, Bieling Heribert, König Roy, Tombach Bernd, Leutner Claudia, Rieber-Brambs Andrea, Nordhoff Dennis, Heindel Walter, Reiser Maximilian, Schild Hans H

Abstract excerpt

PURPOSE: We investigated the respective contribution (in terms of cancer yield and stage at diagnosis) of clinical breast examination (CBE), mammography, ultrasound, and quality-assured breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), used alone or in different combination, for screening women at elevated risk for breast cancer. METHODS: Prospective multicenter observational cohort study. Six hundred eighty-seven...

Topics

Adult
Aged
Breast Neoplasms
Cohort Studies
Female
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mammography

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Mass Screening

Middle Aged

Physical Examination

Prospective Studies

Risk Factors

Ultrasonography

Source

Open in PubMed

Identifiers

PMID: 20177029
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0839

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 31 Aug 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

discussions

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial.PMID 20177029Read ↗

Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Survival benefit in women with BRCA1 mutation or familial risk in the MRI screening study (MRISC).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Screening for hereditary breast cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

MRI and mammography surveillance of women at increased risk for breast cancer: recommendations using an evidence-based approach.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Screening magnetic resonance imaging recommendations and outcomes in patients at high risk for breast cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with an inherited risk for breast cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

MRI breast screening in high-risk women: cancer detection and survival analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.