Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Relationship between three measures of genetic differentiation G(ST), D(EST) and G'(ST): how wrong have we been?

Molecular ecology - 1 May 2009

Heller R, Siegismund H R

Abstract excerpt

No abstract is available from the source.

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genetic Variation
Share to Genetics, Population
Share to Microsatellite Repeats
Share to Models, Genetic

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Models, Statistical

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 19645078
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2009.04185.x

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 16 Oct 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Relationship between three measures of genetic differentiation G(ST), D(EST) and G'(ST): how wrong have we been?PMID 19645078Read ↗

What is genetic differentiation, and how should we measure it--GST, D, neither or both?Semantic proximity Read ↗

G(ST) is still a useful measure of genetic differentiation - a comment on Jost's D.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Calculations of population differentiation based on GST and D: forget GST but not all of statistics!Semantic proximity Read ↗

If F(ST) does not measure neutral genetic differentiation, then comparing it with Q(ST) is misleading. Or is it?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimates of genetic differentiation measured by F(ST) do not necessarily require large sample sizes when using many SNP markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Does GST underestimate genetic differentiation from marker data?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Are Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons for natural populations meaningful?Semantic proximity Read ↗

In defence of genetic distances.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic distances: a useful tool to be applied with caution.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A standardized genetic differentiation measure.Semantic proximity Read ↗

On the measurements of genetic differentiation among populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.