Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

[Toward DSM-V: new approaches for the classification of personality disorders].

Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie - 1 Jan 2008

Pukrop Ralf

Abstract excerpt

Dissatisfaction with the existing categorical classification system for personality disorders has stimulated DSM-V Research Planning Work Groups to check alternative dimensional representations. Four different strategies have been suggested: 1. dimensional representations of existing categories; 2. dimensional reorganization of diagnostic criteria; 3. integration of personality disorders with dimensional models...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Child
Share to Diagnosis, Differential
Share to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Personality Assessment

Share to Personality Disorders

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to Social Environment

Share to Temperament

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 19070203
DOI: 10.13109/prkk.2008.57.89.610

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

[Toward DSM-V: new approaches for the classification of personality disorders].PMID 19070203Read ↗

Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The classification of personality disorders should be rooted in biology.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Toward an empirically based classification of personality disorder.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Dimensional structure of psychoses: relations with diagnostic categories and contribution into the study of endo-phenotypes].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Behavior genetics of personality disorders: informing classification and conceptualization in DSM-5.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Fate of Borderline Pathology in Dimensional Classification Systems: A Narrative ReviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating the Assessment of the ICD-11 Personality Disorder Diagnostic SystemSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating the Assessment of the ICD-11 Personality Disorder Diagnostic SystemSemantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic and genetic structure of traits delineating personality disorder.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Normative and Maladaptive Personality Traits in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Comparative and Hierarchical Analysis of HEXACO and PID-5Semantic proximity Read ↗

Getting the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 ready for clinical practice: Norm values and correlates in a representative sample from the German populationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Latent Profiles of Patients with Borderline Pathology Based on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality DisordersSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.