Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Patient empowerment in clinical genetics services.

Journal of health psychology - 1 Oct 2008

McAllister Marion, Payne Katherine, Macleod Rhona, Nicholls Stuart, Dian Donnai, Davies Linda

Abstract excerpt

Outcome measurement in clinical genetics is problematic because the patient benefits are difficult to measure. The aim in this qualitative grounded theory study was to develop a theoretical framework describing the patient benefits from using clinical genetics services. Seven focus groups and 19 interviews were conducted with patients, patient group representatives, and health professionals. Data analysis...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adaptation, Psychological
Share to Focus Groups
Share to Internal-External Control

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Interview, Psychological

Share to Motivation

Share to Outcome Assessment, Health Care

Share to Patient Education as Topic

Share to Social Support

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 18809640
DOI: 10.1177/1359105308095063

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Patient empowerment in clinical genetics services.PMID 18809640Read ↗

Patient reported outcomes and patient empowerment in clinical genetics servicesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluating empowerment in genetic counseling using patient‐reported outcomesSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale: a new patient-reported outcome measure for clinical genetics servicesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Adaptation and preliminary validation of the genetic counseling outcome scale (GCOS-24) in a Brazilian genetic counseling settingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Personalising genetic counselling (POETIC) trial: A hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation randomised clinical trial of a patient screening tool to improve patient empowerment after cancer genetic counsellingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Research participant perceptions of personal utility in disclosure of individual research results from genomic analysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Defining Our Clinical Practice: The Identification of Genetic Counseling Outcomes Utilizing the Reciprocal Engagement ModelSemantic proximity Read ↗

Strength of the genetic counselor: patient relationship is associated with extent of increased empowerment in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathySemantic proximity Read ↗

Cardiovascular genetic counseling is associated with improved patient-reported outcomes across clinical indications and settingsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of Receiving Secondary Results from Genomic Research: A 12‐Month Longitudinal StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Enrolling Genomics Research Participants through a Clinical Setting: the Impact of Existing Clinical Relationships on Informed Consent and Expectations for Return of Research ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of a Patient‐Facing Enhanced Genomic Results Report to Improve Understanding, Engagement, and CommunicationSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.