Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years

1 Aug 2012

Abstract excerpt

STUDY QUESTION: Do heterosexual parents of young children following oocyte donation (OD) and sperm donation (SD) tell or intend to tell their offspring about the way he/she was conceived? SUMMARY ANSWER: Following successful treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors in Sweden, almost all heterosexual couples intend to tell their offspring about the way he/she was conceived and some start the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 22859508
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des285

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 yearsPMID 22859508Read ↗

Psychological adjustment in disclosing and non-disclosing heterosexual-couple families following conception with oocytes or spermatozoa from identity-release donorsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Potential sperm donors’, recipients’ and their partners’ opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western AustraliaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: a study of parental thinkingSemantic proximity Read ↗

The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspringSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parental disclosure of assisted reproductive technology (ART) conception to their children: a systematic and meta-analytic reviewSemantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosure and donor-conceived childrenSemantic proximity Read ↗

An investigation of the disclosure process and support needs of <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>BRCA2</i> carriersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parent psychological adjustment, donor conception and disclosure: a follow-up over 10 yearsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Short- and long-term health consequences and current satisfaction levels for altruistic anonymous, identity-release and known oocyte donorsSemantic proximity Read ↗

The right of the donor to information about children conceived from his or her gametesSemantic proximity Read ↗

A survey of 1700 women who formed their families using donor spermatozoaSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Process of Disclosure: Mothers' Experiences of Communicating X-Linked Carrier Risk Information to At-Risk Daughters.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.