Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Evaluation of CDC-Recommended Approaches for Confirmatory Testing of Positive Neisseria gonorrhoeae Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Results

6 Mar 2008

Abstract excerpt

We evaluated three of the CDC approaches for confirming Neisseria gonorrhoeae (gonococcus [GC])-positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) results: (i) repeating the original test on the original specimen, (ii) testing the original specimen with a different test, and (iii) performing a different test on a duplicate specimen collected at the same visit. For the first approach, clinical specimens were...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Share to Reproductive tract infections research
Share to Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 18322062
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.02301-07

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Evaluation of CDC-Recommended Approaches for Confirmatory Testing of Positive Neisseria gonorrhoeae Nucleic Acid Amplification Test ResultsPMID 18322062Read ↗

Exploring ‘best practice’ for nucleic acid detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeaeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of Six Commercial Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Other Neisseria SpeciesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Review of 2005 Public Health Laboratory Network Neisseria gonorrhoeae nucleic acid amplification tests guidelines.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the APTIMA CT and GC Assays with the APTIMA Combo 2 Assay, the Abbott LCx Assay, and Direct Fluorescent-Antibody and Culture Assays for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeaeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Molecular Diagnostics for Gonorrhoea: Implications for Antimicrobial Resistance and the Threat of Untreatable GonorrhoeaSemantic proximity Read ↗

Use of Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing for Diagnosis of Anorectal Sexually Transmitted InfectionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Will targeting oropharyngeal gonorrhoea delay the further emergence of drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Gonorrhoea diagnostics: An updateSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analytical specificity and sensitivity of the novel dual-target GeneProof Neisseria gonorrhoeae PCR kit for detection of N. gonorrhoeae.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Utility of specimens positive for Neisseria gonorrhoeae by the Aptima Combo 2 assay for assessment of strain diversity and antibiotic resistance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Neisseria gonorrhoeae False-Positive Result Obtained from a Pharyngeal Swab by Using the Roche cobas 4800 CT/NG Assay in New Zealand in 2012Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the Specificities of Five DNA Amplification Methods for the Detection of <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i>Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.