Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Estimation of accuracy and bias in genetic evaluations with genetic groups using sampling.

Journal of animal science - 1 May 2008

Hickey J M, Keane M G, Kenny D A, Cromie A R, Mulder H A, Veerkamp R F

Abstract excerpt

Accuracy and bias of EBV are important measures of the quality of genetic evaluations. A sampling method that accounts for the uncertainty in the estimation of genetic group effects was used to calculate accuracy and bias of estimated effects. The method works by repeatedly simulating phenotypes for multiple traits for a defined data and pedigree structure. These simulated values are analyzed using BLUP with...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bias
Share to Body Composition
Share to Breeding

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Cattle

Share to Computer Simulation

Share to Quantitative Trait Loci

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Share to Sensitivity and Specificity

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 18272854
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0653

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Estimation of accuracy and bias in genetic evaluations with genetic groups using sampling.PMID 18272854Read ↗

Contribution of herd characteristics to best linear unbiased estimates of slaughter traits in beef cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Correcting for base-population differences and unknown parent groups in single-step genomic predictions of Norwegian Red cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices.Semantic proximity Read ↗

How pedigree errors affect genetic evaluations and validation statistics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Should genetic groups be fitted in BLUP evaluation? Practical answer for the French AI beef sire evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracy of Igenity genomically estimated breeding values for predicting Australian Angus BREEDPLAN traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimation of variance components and prediction of breeding values based on group records from varying group sizes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of methods to estimate genomic relationships using pedigree and markers in livestock populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A simple method to separate base population and segregation effects in genomic relationship matrices.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Optimized grouping to increase accuracy of prediction of breeding values based on group records in genomic selection breeding programs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Short communication: Genomic selection in a crossbred cattle population using data from the Dairy Genetics East Africa Project.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Using pooled data for genomic prediction in a bivariate framework with missing data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.