Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Negative environmental perturbations may improve species persistence.

Proceedings. Biological sciences - 7 Oct 2006

Robert Alexandre

Abstract excerpt

Among the factors proximally involved in the extinction of small isolated populations, genetic deterioration and temporal variation in environmental quality have been the subjects of intensive research in ecological and evolutionary sciences. However, previous theoretical studies and population v...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ecosystem
Share to Environment
Share to Extinction, Biological

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Load

Share to Inbreeding

Share to Models, Biological

Share to Population Dynamics

Share to Time Factors

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 16959641
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3601
PMCID: PMC1634910

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-16959641-2026-09-02.2. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-02.2.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Negative environmental perturbations may improve species persistence.PMID 16959641Read ↗

The interaction of inbreeding depression and environmental stochasticity in the risk of extinction of small populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Extinction vortices are driven more by a shortage of beneficial mutations than by deleterious mutation accumulation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Strongly deleterious mutations are a primary determinant of extinction risk due to inbreeding depressionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evolutionary rescue in a fluctuating environment: periodic versus quasi-periodic environmental changes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Surviving environmental change: when increasing population size can increase extinction risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-wide deleterious mutation favors dispersal and species integrity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Predicting patterns of long-term adaptation and extinction with population genetics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Deleterious Variation in Natural Populations and Implications for Conservation Genetics.Semantic proximity Read ↗

When does conservation genetics matter?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Revisiting evolutionary rescue in the wild.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Environmental unpredictability and inbreeding depression select for mixed dispersal syndromesSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Genetic Paradox of Invasions revisited: the potential role of inbreeding × environment interactions in invasion success.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.