Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Screening for disease: how far is too far?

The Lancet. Neurology - 1 Jan 2005

Abstract excerpt

No abstract is available from the source.

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adenomatous Polyposis Coli
Share to Fertilization in Vitro
Share to Genetic Diseases, Inborn
Share to Germany

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Huntington Disease

Share to Muscular Atrophy, Spinal

Share to Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne

Share to Preimplantation Diagnosis

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 15620843
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00941-X

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Screening for disease: how far is too far?PMID 15620843Read ↗

Health screening tests: a note of caution.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Testing for genetic susceptibility: what you see is not what you get.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Cancer, Our Genes, And The Anxiety Of Risk-Based Medicine.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Principles of screening.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pushing the boundaries of rare disease diagnostics with the help of the first Undiagnosed HackathonSemantic proximity Read ↗

Newborn screening conditions: What we know, what we do not know, and how we will know itSemantic proximity Read ↗

Banishing biases to save lives: introducing genetic testing for familial cancers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Population screening requires robust evidence—genomics is no exceptionSemantic proximity Read ↗

On the futility of screening for genes that make you fat.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Population screening in a Druze community: the challenge and the rewardSemantic proximity Read ↗

Bringing monogenic disease screening to the clinic.Semantic proximity Read ↗

What is a disease?Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.