Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

[Comparison of two reverse hybridization methods for mycobacterial identification in clinical practice].

Pathologie-biologie - 1 Oct 2004

Trombert-Paolantoni S, Poveda J-D, Figarella P

Abstract excerpt

AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the performance of two commercial methods for identification of Mycobacterium species: InnoLiPA Mycobacteria first version (Innogenetics) versus Genotype MTBC and Genotype Mycobacterium (HAIN) on, respectively, 2123 and 2164 distinct isolates. MATERIALS AND METHODS:...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to DNA, Bacterial
Share to Mycobacterium
Share to Mycobacterium Infections

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Nucleic Acid Hybridization

Share to Polymerase Chain Reaction

Share to RNA, Bacterial

Share to RNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Share to RNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 15465265
DOI: 10.1016/j.patbio.2004.07.018

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 1 Sept 2026. Prepared record publication-15465265-2026-09-01.1. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-01.1.

Source receipt: PubMed via Helena Literature Corpus, retrieved 1 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

[Comparison of two reverse hybridization methods for mycobacterial identification in clinical practice].PMID 15465265Read ↗

Rapid Identification of Mycobacteria to the Species Level Using INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria, a Reverse Hybridization AssaySemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative evaluation of the new version of the INNO-LiPA Mycobacteria and genotype Mycobacterium assays for identification of Mycobacterium species from MB/BacT liquid cultures artificially inoculated with Mycobacterial strains.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of INNO-LiPA MYCOBACTERIA v2: Improved Reverse Hybridization Multiple DNA Probe Assay for Mycobacterial IdentificationSemantic proximity Read ↗

[Identification of atypical mycobacteria isolated from clinical specimens by line probe assay (LIPA)].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Commercial DNA Probes for Mycobacteria Incorrectly Identify a Number of Less Frequently Encountered SpeciesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of the GenoType Mycobacteria Direct assay for the simultaneous detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and four atypical mycobacterial species in smear-positive respiratory specimens.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mycobacterium Species Identification and Rifampin Resistance Testing with High-Density DNA Probe ArraysSemantic proximity Read ↗

Use of the INNO-LiPA-MYCOBACTERIA Assay (Version 2) for Identification ofMycobacterium avium-Mycobacterium intracellulare-Mycobacterium scrofulaceumComplex IsolatesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria: utility of the GenoType Mycobacterium CM/AS assay compared with HPLC and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

PCR assay based on DNA coding for 16S rRNA for detection and identification of mycobacteria in clinical samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Rapid detection of resistance against rifampicin in isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Brazilian patients using a reverse-phase hybridization assay.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of the molecular FluoroType Mycobacteria VER 1.0 and the Maldi BioTyper Mycobacteria assays for the identification of non-tuberculous mycobacteria.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.