Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of Conventional and Molecular Methods for Identification of Aerobic Catalase-Negative Gram-Positive Cocci in the Clinical Laboratory

1 May 2004

Abstract excerpt

Over a period of 18 months we have evaluated the use of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequence analysis as a means of identifying aerobic catalase-negative gram-positive cocci in the clinical laboratory. A total of 171 clinically relevant strains were studied. The results of molecular analyses were compared with those obtained with a commercially available phenotypic identification system (API 20 Strep system;...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Share to Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Share to Streptococcal Infections and Treatments

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 15131171
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.42.5.2065-2073.2004

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of Conventional and Molecular Methods for Identification of Aerobic Catalase-Negative Gram-Positive Cocci in the Clinical LaboratoryPMID 15131171Read ↗

16S Ribosomal DNA Sequence-Based Analysis of Clinically Significant Gram-Positive Anaerobic CocciSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ribosomal DNA sequencing for identification of aerobic gram-positive rods in the clinical laboratory (an 18-month evaluation).Semantic proximity Read ↗

16S rRNA Gene Sequencing versus the API 20 NE System and the VITEK 2 ID-GNB Card for Identification of Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Bacteria in the Clinical LaboratorySemantic proximity Read ↗

Identification, classification, and clinical relevance of catalase-negative, gram-positive cocci, excluding the streptococci and enterococci.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A comparison of polymerase chain reaction and phenotyping for rapid speciation of enterococci and detection of vancomycin resistance.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accuracies of Leuconostoc phenotypic identification: a comparison of API systems and conventional phenotypic assays.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genotypic and phenotypic methods for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates from blood cultures.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of phenotypic characteristics, DNA-DNA hybridization results, and results with a commercial rapid biochemical and enzymatic reaction system for identification of viridans group streptococci.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of Clinical Isolates of α-Hemolytic Streptococci by 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Using MALDI Biotyper, and Conventional Phenotypic Methods: a ComparisonSemantic proximity Read ↗

Use of tuf as a target for sequence-based identification of Gram-positive cocci of the genus Enterococcus, Streptococcus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, and LactococcusSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic methods for the species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates from bovine intramammary infections.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Identification of clinical coryneform bacterial isolates: comparison of biochemical methods and sequence analysis of 16S rRNA and rpoB genes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.