Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Discrimination between selected lines of pigs using AFLP markers.

Heredity - 1 Nov 2003

Cameron N D, van Eijk M J T, Brugmans B, Peleman J

Abstract excerpt

Amplified fragment length polymorphic (AFLP) markers were used to discriminate between lines of pigs, divergently selected over seven generations for components of efficient lean growth rate. A total of 270 animals with 30 animals per line were genotyped for 239 polymorphic AFLP markers. Canonical variate analysis identified linear combinations of the AFLP marker scores that grouped animals by selection line with...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Cluster Analysis
Share to Genetic Carrier Screening
Share to Genetic Variation

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length

Share to Selection, Genetic

Share to Species Specificity

Share to Sus scrofa

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 14576743
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800314

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Discrimination between selected lines of pigs using AFLP markers.PMID 14576743Read ↗

Genetic diversity in European pigs utilizing amplified fragment length polymorphism markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Quantitative trait loci variation for growth and obesity between and within lines of pigs (Sus scrofa).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Principal Component Analysis of Conformation and Blood Marker Traits at Pre- and Post-Weaning Stages of Growth in F2 Crossbred Nigerian Indigenous X Landrace Pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Study of genetic variability in pigs after the traditional breeding program.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic analysis of Ankamali pigs of India using microsatellite markers and their comparison with other domesticated Indian pig types.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic diversity in native and commercial breeds of pigs in Portugal assessed by microsatellites.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Estimates of genetic parameters among scale activity scores, growth, and fatness in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic diversity analysis using lowly polymorphic dominant markers: the example of AFLP in pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Partition of genetic trends by origin in Landrace and Large-White pigs.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessment of genetic diversity of Korean native pig (Sus scrofa) using AFLP markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic measurements and various indices of lean and fat tissue development in barrows and gilts of two genetic lines from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic diversity, growth and heart function of Auckland Island pigs, a potential source for organ xenotransplantation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.