Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Choosing not to undergo predictive genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: expanding our understanding of decliners and declining.

Journal of behavioral medicine - 1 Aug 2017

Keogh Louise A, Niven Heather, Rutstein Alison, Flander Louisa, Gaff Clara, Jenkins Mark

Abstract excerpt

While medical research continues to investigate the genetic basis of cancer, and personalised prevention gains momentum, little research has been conducted with the individuals who decline predictive genetic testing for cancer. We recruited individuals who had been offered genetic testing for Lynch syndrome or bi-allelic MUTYH mutations due to their participation in a large, population-based, Australia-wide...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Australia

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Colorectal Neoplasms

Share to Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis

Share to DNA Glycosylases

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Mutation

Share to Truth Disclosure

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 28197815
DOI: 10.1007/s10865-016-9820-0
PMCID: PMC6057776

Genes

MUTYH

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Choosing not to undergo predictive genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes: expanding our understanding of decliners and declining.PMID 28197815Read ↗

What can we Learn from Patients' Ethical Thinking about the right 'not to know' in Genomics? Lessons from Cancer Genetic Testing for Genetic Counselling.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reasons for Declining Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening Using Genome SequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-uptake of predictive genetic testing for BRCA1/2 among relatives of known carriers: attributes, cancer worry, and barriers to testing in a multicenter clinical cohort.Semantic proximity Read ↗

How the "control-fate continuum" helps explain the genetic testing decision-making process: a grounded theory study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Distress in unaffected individuals who decline, delay or remain ineligible for genetic testing for hereditary diseases: a systematic review.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Investigating barriers to genetic counseling and germline mutation testing in women with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome and Lynch syndrome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Who declines genetic counseling? An assessment of genetic counseling declination among individuals participating in a population-wide genomic screening program.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Unraveling non‐participation in genomic research: A complex interplay of barriers, facilitators, and sociocultural factorsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Is uptake of genetic testing for colorectal cancer influenced by knowledge of insurance implications?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving the uptake of predictive testing and colorectal screening in Lynch syndrome: a regional primary care survey.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes towards colorectal cancer screening in Lynch syndrome families: how do they change from pre-test genetic counseling to 6 and 12-months post-disclosure?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Psychosocial consequences of predictive genetic testing for Lynch syndrome and associations to surveillance behaviour in a 7-year follow-up study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.