Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Commentary: Balancing quantity and quality when designing epidemiological studies.

International journal of epidemiology - 1 Feb 2003

Phillips Andrew

Abstract excerpt

No abstract is available from the source.

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Data Collection
Share to Environmental Exposure
Share to Epidemiologic Research Design
Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Sample Size

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 12690009
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyg043

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Commentary: Balancing quantity and quality when designing epidemiological studies.PMID 12690009Read ↗

Commentary: Mendelian Randomization, 18 years on.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Commentary: the concept of 'Mendelian Randomization'.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Commentary: Frailty and heterogeneity in epidemiological studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Building a sample characteristics table for studies on peer-reviewed publications: Rationale and pipeline developmentSemantic proximity Read ↗

Building a sample characteristics table for studies on peer-reviewed publications: Rationale and pipeline developmentSemantic proximity Read ↗

Commentary: weighing burdens and benefits rather than competence.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development of a checklist to detect errors in meta-analyses in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocolSemantic proximity Read ↗

Commentary: Two-sample Mendelian randomization: opportunities and challenges.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Meta-Mar: An AI-Assisted Web Platform for Accessible and Rigorous Meta-AnalysisSemantic proximity Read ↗

The role of cohort studies in medical research.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Association Studies in an Era of Too Much InformationSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.