Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genotype x environment interactions in conventional versus pasture-based dairies in Canada.

Journal of dairy science - 1 Jan 2003

Boettcher P J, Fatehl J, Schutz M M

Abstract excerpt

The objective of this study was to evaluate effects of genotype x environmental interaction (GxE) on dairy traits among herds in Canada that practice intensive rotational grazing versus conventional methods that rely on stored feeds. Based on responses to questionnaires, 22 herds were selected for the grazing group and the conventional group consisted of 34 large free-stall dairies. Production data consisted of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Animal Feed
Share to Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Share to Canada

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Dairying

Share to Lactation

Share to Poaceae

Share to Regression Analysis

Share to Reproduction

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 12613882
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(03)73617-0

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genotype x environment interactions in conventional versus pasture-based dairies in Canada.PMID 12613882Read ↗

Genotype x environment interaction for grazing versus confinement. I. Production traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype by environment interaction for production traits while accounting for heteroscedasticity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype x environment interaction for grazing vs. confinement. II. Health and reproduction traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype x environment interactions in Angus, Brahman, and reciprocal-cross cows and their calves grazing common bermudagrass, endophyte-infected tall fescue pastures, or both forages.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype by environment interaction for first-lactation female fertility traits in UK dairy cattle.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype by environment interaction for milk production traits between organic and conventional dairy cattle production in The Netherlands.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype x environment interactions for postweaning performance in crossbred calves grazing winter wheat pasture or dormant native prairie.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Ignoring genotype by environment interaction in the genetic evaluation of dairy cattle reduces accuracy but may increase selection intensity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype x environment interactions in milk yield and quality in Angus, Brahman, and reciprocal-cross cows on different forage systems.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype by environment interaction for yield and somatic cell score with alternative environmental definitions.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotype x environment interactions in preweaning traits of purebred and reciprocal cross Angus and Brahman calves on common bermudagrass and endophyte-infected tall fescue pastures.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluations of genotypexenvironment interactions of beef bulls performance-tested in feedlot or pasture.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.