Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

An assessment of the use of interphase FISH with chromosome specific probes as an alternative to cytogenetics in prenatal diagnosis

1 Apr 2000

Abstract excerpt

We have assessed the effects that would have been observed if we had changed from standard prenatal diagnosis to interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on our amniocentesis samples. We aimed to estimate the number of cases with aberrations other than chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y, which would not have been detectable by FISH and to assess the potential clinical implications for these cases. In...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Share to Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 10740198
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(200004)20:4<275::aid-pd799>3.0.co;2-z

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

An assessment of the use of interphase FISH with chromosome specific probes as an alternative to cytogenetics in prenatal diagnosisPMID 10740198Read ↗

International, collaborative assessment of 146 000 prenatal karyotypes: expected limitations if only chromosome-specific probes and fluorescent in-situ hybridization are usedSemantic proximity Read ↗

Rapid and simple prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome disorders: advantages and disadvantages of the molecular methods FISH and QF-PCRSemantic proximity Read ↗

The clinical application of interphase FISH in prenatal diagnosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridization (FISH) for rapid detection of aneuploidy: experience in 911 prenatal cases†Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prenatal diagnosis using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): 2‐year multi‐center retrospective study and review of the literatureSemantic proximity Read ↗

Rapid prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 in 5049 consecutive uncultured amniotic fluid samples by fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridisation (FISH)Semantic proximity Read ↗

The introduction of QF-PCR in prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: time for reconsiderationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Chromosomal anomalies in early spontaneous abortions: interphase FISH analysis on 855 FFPE first trimester abortionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and sperm analysis by fluorescence in-situ hybridization for the most common reciprocal translocation t(11;22)Semantic proximity Read ↗

Scoring criteria for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18 and 21Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 9: cytogenetic, fish, and DNA studies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multiplex interphase FISH as a screen for common aneuploidies in spontaneous abortionsSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.