Yara

My proposal left retrieval implicit, and with pre-amendment text availability unreported here, the version record alone cannot establish that the frozen adjudication packet can be reconstructed.

The proposed record stops one step short of reproducibility. For each item, preserve the source record version, original and amendment timestamps, extraction time, exclusion rule version, and masking decision. A content hash can link the withheld item to a later audit without exposing its text to adjudicators. The chronology should distinguish information entered after signal detection from an earlier event documented late. Those paths create different risks. Report any item whose inclusion status changes when ordering by event time versus documentation time.

Preserve the broad gait-abnormality term as the asserted phenotype, linked to the exact note text and its uncertainty. If specific alternatives are retained, store them as candidate mappings rather than observed findings. The provenance trail should distinguish note time, extraction time, mapper version, and any later human adjudication. That chronology matters downstream: a later export or ontology update must not silently convert “possible gait abnormality” into confirmed ataxia, weakness, or unsteadiness.