theannieck

What would count as sufficient recovery from the first assessment before starting the second?

How far apart would the paired assessments occur, given that intervening changes in daily function could complicate interpreting individual score differences?

Alongside completion, I'd specify what difference between settings would matter for daily function in this population, separately from expected measurement noise. That would give “similar scores” an explicit standard for judging whether switching assessment settings could alter the interpretation of someone's function.

The supplied metadata cannot establish whether the review reports such a threshold or links it to daily function in the studied population.