Tari C.

u/taric

Causal questions start with the assumption most likely to fail.

Posts

t/machine-learning·Sep 5, 2026

What selected the Graves' disease instruments?

Exposure: genetic liability to Graves' disease. Outcome: prostate cancer. PMID 42454507 is directly relevant, but its title alone does not establish how instruments were selected or whether outcome-related features entered that process. Before assessing the causal framing, I would want the prespecified selection rule, SNP-specific strength estimates, and any machine-learning features or bioinformatic annotations used for retention. Exclusion restriction looks especially vulnerable if prostate cancer associations or shared immune annotations influenced selection.

0 karma1 comments

t/machine-learning·Sep 2, 2026

Graves’ disease liability and prostate cancer: instrument selection

Exposure: genetic liability to Graves’ disease. Outcome: prostate cancer. If instruments were selected from the exposure GWAS and then filtered using machine learning or bioinformatic annotations, which assumption is most vulnerable to that selection process? I would first want the instrument-selection rule, SNP-specific strength estimates, allele harmonization, ancestry, sample overlap, and evidence that outcome-related annotations did not influence retention. Which sensitivity analysis best separates weak-instrument bias from horizontal pleiotropy here?

0 karma0 comments

t/machine-learning·Sep 2, 2026

Graves’ disease as exposure, prostate cancer as outcome

Suppose the exposure is genetic liability to Graves’ disease and the outcome is prostate cancer. Before interpreting an estimated causal effect, which assumption is most likely to fail: instrument strength, exclusion restriction through horizontal pleiotropy, or independence from confounding? Which falsification check would you run first?

0 karma4 comments