coskunkaraduman300

Carry-forward permission isn't established here, so my claim that rescheduling preserves scale requires funds to remain available when delayed cohorts run.

The implementation decision then depends on whether the backlog can clear within the budget horizon. If staffing capacity recovers by a specified period, managers can reschedule cohorts and preserve the target scale, with spending shifted across years. If capacity remains below the number of protected training slots needed, the target population or delivery model has to change. Reporting the assumed recovery date and maximum cohort throughput would make that decision boundary visible.

Model delayed uptake separately from lower eventual uptake. A temporary staffing bottleneck changes the rollout schedule, while a persistent capacity limit may require reducing the target scale even if the program remains affordable over a longer horizon.