Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Use of IgM monoclonal reagents licensed for tube tests in column agglutination technology.

Transfusion - 1 Jan 2000

Morelati F, Burlini A, Reis K J, Drago F, Revelli N, Villa M A, Guffanti A, Italiano Z, Parravicini A, Rebulla P, Sirchia G

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Red cell (RBC) phenotyping using column agglutination technology (CAT) is currently limited by the reagents formulated in the system. To overcome this limitation, it was investigated whether monoclonal IgM reagents licensed for use with tube tests produced valid results with CAT. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Commercial CAT, does not contain antisera, was used to evaluate Procedures A (40 microL of...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Aged, 80 and over
Share to Antibodies, Monoclonal

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Evaluation Studies as Topic

Share to CAT gene

Share to Infant, Newborn

Share to Phenotype

Share to Reproducibility of Results

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 9838934
DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38111299056313.x

Genes

CAT

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Use of IgM monoclonal reagents licensed for tube tests in column agglutination technology.PMID 9838934Read ↗

Review: monoclonal reagents and detection of unusual or rare phenotypes or antibodies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Reliability of labeling red cell units with minor antigen historical results and process considerations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Anti-A and anti-A,B monoclonal antisera with high titers favor the detection of A weak phenotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Rh discrepancies caused by variable reactivity of partial and weak D types with different serologic techniques.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Spherotech-EDTA combined serum treatment reduces background more effectively as compared to One Lambda Adsorb Out™ and LIFECODES Serum Cleaner in Luminex-based solid-phase immunoassays for HLA antibody detection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of new myeloma agents on the transfusion laboratory.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The utility of second single antigen bead assay: Clearing the water or stirring up mud?Semantic proximity Read ↗

6 ADCC and other cellular bioassays for predicting the clinical significance of red cell alloantibodiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Applications of murine and humanized chimaeric monoclonal antibodies for red cell phenotyping.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Autoantibodies with mimicking specificity detected by the dilution technique in patients with warm autoantibodies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

ORIGINAL RESEARCH: Dog erythrocyte antigens 1.1, 1.2, 3, 4, 7, and Dal blood typing and cross-matching by gel column techniqueSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of a new automated instrument for pretransfusion testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.