Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Distinct Phenotypes of Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse in Women: A Comparison of Defecation-Only and Spontaneous Presentations.

Neurogastroenterology and motility - 1 Feb 2026

Zhou Zeyi, Earley Michelle, Hoy Sydni Au, Sheth Vipul R, Gurland Brooke, Neshatian Leila

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: While some patients report full thickness rectal prolapse (RP) exclusively during defecation, others may experience it spontaneously during walking, exercise, and/or all the time. We hypothesized that patients with RP only during defecation have more preserved physiological and anatomical characteristics and aimed to identify the phenotypes of patients with various RP expression. METHODS: A...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Anal Canal

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Share to Phenotype

Share to Rectum

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 41708524
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.70265

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Distinct Phenotypes of Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse in Women: A Comparison of Defecation-Only and Spontaneous Presentations.PMID 41708524Read ↗

Beyond POP-Q: A Hypothesis-Generating Anatomical-Support Phenotyping Framework for Female Pelvic Floor DisordersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Characterization of symptom severity and impact on four fecal incontinence phenotypes in women presenting for evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Adding a Bedside Hiatal Sign to POP-Q: A Hypothesis-Generating Anatomical-Support Phenotyping Framework for Female Pelvic Floor DisordersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic identification and classification of functional defecatory disorders using high-resolution anorectal manometry.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in 102 patients: Do different phenotypes make sense?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prospective cohort study of phenotypic variation based on an anal sphincter function in adults with fecal incontinence.Semantic proximity Read ↗

High and low take-off external prolapse phenotypes can be characterised preoperatively on defaecation proctography.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic variation in functional disorders of defecation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The value of dynamic magnetic resonance defecography in assessing the severity of defecation disordersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Dyssynergia phenotypes in obstructed defecation: insights from Fecobionics assessment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of Patient Impact and Clinical Characteristics Between Urgency and Passive Fecal Incontinence Phenotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Patient-Reported Outcome-Based BFR/BMR Coding System for Functional Pelvic Floor Disorders: A TNM-Inspired Integrative FrameworkSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.