Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Comparison of Patient Impact and Clinical Characteristics Between Urgency and Passive Fecal Incontinence Phenotypes.

Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery - 1 Sept 2020

Pahwa Avita K, Khanijow Kavita D, Harvie Heidi S, Arya Lily A, Andy Uduak U

Abstract excerpt

OBJECTIVE: To determine if categorizing fecal incontinence (FI) as urgency or passive FI is clinically meaningful, we compared clinical severity, quality of life, physical examination findings, and functional and anatomic deficits between women with urgency and passive FI. METHODS: This study is a prospective cross-sectional study of women with at least monthly FI. All women completed the St Mark's Vaizey and the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Anal Canal

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Cross-Sectional Studies

Share to Phenotype

Share to Quality of Life

Share to Severity of Illness Index

Share to Surveys and Questionnaires

Share to Ultrasonography

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 29979355
DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000603
PMCID: PMC8451229

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Comparison of Patient Impact and Clinical Characteristics Between Urgency and Passive Fecal Incontinence Phenotypes.PMID 29979355Read ↗

Characterization of symptom severity and impact on four fecal incontinence phenotypes in women presenting for evaluation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Prospective cohort study of phenotypic variation based on an anal sphincter function in adults with fecal incontinence.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Distinct Phenotypes of Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse in Women: A Comparison of Defecation-Only and Spontaneous Presentations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Overactive Bladder Patients With and Without Urgency Incontinence: A Spectrum of One Condition or Different Phenotypes?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Geldof Expert Consensus Classification of Perianal Fistulizing Crohn’s Disease: A Real-World Application in a Serial Fistula MRI CohortSemantic proximity Read ↗

Safety and efficacy of low-volume transanal irrigation in adults with bowel dysfunction: a prospective multicenter studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Genome-Wide Association Study for Urinary and Fecal Incontinence in Women.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Beyond POP-Q: A Hypothesis-Generating Anatomical-Support Phenotyping Framework for Female Pelvic Floor DisordersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network (LURN): An introduction to the Urinary Urgency Phenotyping Protocol LURN II.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotypic identification and classification of functional defecatory disorders using high-resolution anorectal manometry.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in 102 patients: Do different phenotypes make sense?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Assessing the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of primary anal fissure among Jordanian patients: A cross-sectional studySemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.