Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Consumer acceptability of a cancer registry-driven familial cancer testing pathway: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

Future oncology (London, England) - 1 Feb 2026

Fehlberg Zoe, Evans Sue M, Bechelli Maria, Peters Sanne, Abraham Anu, Bogwitz Michael, Campbell Ainsley, Van Niel Halianna, Trainer Alison H, Best Stephanie

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Familial cancer test referral rates for rare tumors are suboptimal and follow a social gradient; while cancer registries are legally mandated to collect comprehensive clinical pathological data which could be used to inform clinical practice. We aimed to investigate consumer acceptability of and preferred approach for a cancer registry-driven familial cancer testing notification pathway. METHODS: A...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Testing

Share to Neoplasms

Share to Patient Acceptance of Health Care

Share to Qualitative Research

Share to Registries

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 41653022
DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2026.2621128
PMCID: PMC13048603

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 8 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Consumer acceptability of a cancer registry-driven familial cancer testing pathway: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.PMID 41653022Read ↗

"I Didn't Have to Worry about It": Patient and Family Experiences with Health System Involvement in Notifying Relatives of Genetic Test Results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development and Evaluation of a Telephone Communication Protocol for the Delivery of Personalized Melanoma Genomic Risk to the General PopulationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian publicSemantic proximity Read ↗

Research opportunities in precision oncology: Perspectives on biospecimen and genomic data sharing from adults with cancer in IrelandSemantic proximity Read ↗

Informed Consent in Genomic Testing: Healthcare Professionals’ Perceptions on the Value of a Dynamic Consent Platform in Precision OncologySemantic proximity Read ↗

Implementing Electronic Informed Consent in Rare Disease GenomicsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Experiences Accessing and Receiving Tumour Genetic Profiling in Victoria: A Consumer-Led Cross-Sectional Survey StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Health professionals contacting patients' relatives directly about genetic risk (with patient consent): current clinical practice and perspectives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Compliance with professional guidelines with reference to familial cancer services.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of Canadian researchers toward the return to participants of incidental and targeted genomic findings obtained in a pediatric research settingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Open sharing of genomic data: Who does it and why?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Unselected Women's Experiences of Receiving Genetic Research Results for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.