High- and low-risk human papillomavirus prevalence in sinonasal inverted papilloma, a retrospective study.

doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2025.07.004

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Back to search

Article

High- and low-risk human papillomavirus prevalence in sinonasal inverted papilloma, a retrospective study.

Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi - 1 Mar 2026

Palacios-Saucedo Gerardo C, Vazquez-Guillen Jose Manuel, Flores-Flores Aldo Sebastian, Alfaro-Reyes Leslie Vianney, Leon-De Avila Ana Teresa, Zavala-Pompa Angel, Rivera-Morales Lydia Guadalupe, Martinez-Torres Ana Carolina, Lopez-Vazquez Roberto, Castelan-Maldonado Edmundo Erbey, De Leija-Portilla Julia Oliva, Hernandez-Martinez Silvia Judith, Tamez-Guerra Reyes S, Rodriguez-Padilla Cristina

Abstract excerpt

Sinonasal inverted papilloma (SnIP) is a benign but locally aggressive tumor with a high recurrence rates and potential for malignant transformation. Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been suggested as a possible factor, though detection rates vary. This study examined the prevalence of HPV genotypes in SnIP tumor tissues from patients treated at a tertiary hospital in northeastern Mexico. A retrospective analysis...

Topics

Humans
Retrospective Studies
Papilloma, Inverted
Female
Male
Middle Aged
Papillomavirus Infections
Aged

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms

Mexico

Adult

Prevalence

Genotype

DNA, Viral

Papillomaviridae

Human papillomavirus 18

Human papillomavirus 11

Aged, 80 and over

Source

Open in PubMed

Identifiers

PMID: 40619310
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2025.07.004

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 30 Aug 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

discussions

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.