Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Phenotypes based on respiratory drive and effort to identify the risk factors when P0.1 fails to estimate ∆PES in ventilated children.

Critical care (London, England) - 4 Oct 2024

Vedrenne-Cloquet Meryl, Ito Y, Hotz J, Klein M J, Herrera M, Chang D, Bhalla A K, Newth C J L, Khemani R G

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: Monitoring respiratory effort and drive during mechanical ventilation is needed to deliver lung and diaphragm protection. Esophageal pressure (∆PES) is the gold standard measure of respiratory effort but is not routinely available. Airway occlusion pressure in the first 100 ms of the breath (P0.1) is a readily available surrogate for both respiratory effort and drive but is only modestly correlated...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adolescent
Share to Child

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Child, Preschool

Share to Esophagus

Share to Infant

Share to Respiration, Artificial

Share to Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Share to Risk Factors

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 39367452
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05103-x
PMCID: PMC11453010

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Phenotypes based on respiratory drive and effort to identify the risk factors when P0.1 fails to estimate ∆PES in ventilated children.PMID 39367452Read ↗

Physiological comparison of three spontaneous breathing trials in COVID-19 pneumoniae. Inspiratory effort, and relationship with the different phenotypes. Risk of patient self-inflicted lung injury.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pediatric ARDS phenotypes in critical COVID-19: implications for therapies and outcomesSemantic proximity Read ↗

An Appraisal of Respiratory System Compliance In Mechanically Ventilated Covid-19 PatientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Developing A Data Pipeline to Quantify Ventilator WaveformsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Long term ventilation into pediatric central apneas: etiologies, profiles and therapeutic approaches over a decadeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Predictors of Respiratory Drive in Critically Ill Patients on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Prospective Cohort StudySemantic proximity Read ↗

Development of respiratory control: Evolving concepts and perspectivesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reference values of respiratory impedance with impulse oscillometry in healthy Chinese adultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Preload insufficiency as common denominator of exertional dyspnoea in distinct post-COVID phenotypesSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Development, Optimization, and Validation of Four Different Machine Learning Algorithms to Identify Ventilator DyssynchronySemantic proximity Read ↗

Reverse Trigger Phenotypes in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

ARDS patients with CRS less than 45 cm/H2O and small body sizes may not be fit for high-PEEP levels: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trialSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.