Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Reproductive deliberation: Supporting autonomous decision making in prenatal genetic counseling

10 Feb 2023

Abstract excerpt

As both the scope and popularity of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) have expanded, debate has emerged about the extent to which this test enhances or undermines reproductive autonomy. Genetic counseling is crucial to support autonomy in the context of making complex and value-laden decisions about reproductive care following high-chance results from NIPT. Two models of post-test prenatal genetic counseling...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Share to Reproductive Health and Technologies

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 36765016
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1682

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 3 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Reproductive deliberation: Supporting autonomous decision making in prenatal genetic counselingPMID 36765016Read ↗

Prenatal Diagnosis: Choices Women Make About Pursuing Testing and Acting on Abnormal ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Decision-Making Process about Prenatal Genetic Screening: How deeply do Moms-to-Be Want to Know from Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Making the most of the first prenatal visit: The challenge of expanding prenatal genetic testing options and limited clinical encounter timeSemantic proximity Read ↗

The decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Initial findings from a grounded theory studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Pandora's pregnancy: NIPT, CMA, and genome sequencing—A new era for prenatal genetic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non‐invasive prenatal diagnosis for single gene disorders: experience of patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reproductive autonomous choice — A cherished illusion? Reproductive autonomy examined in the context of preimplantation genetic diagnosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Decision-making and experiences of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in inherited heart diseases: a qualitative studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic tests as prophecy: understanding self-defeating and self-fulfilling mechanisms in (predictive) genetic testing.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision‐makingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Choosing not to choose: reproductive responses of parents of children with genetic conditions or impairments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.