Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

The decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Initial findings from a grounded theory study

8 Mar 2012

Abstract excerpt

No abstract is available from the source.

Topics

Join the communities discussing this publication.

Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Reproductive Health and Technologies

Source

Identifiers

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

PMID: 22445765
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.003

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 1 Sept 2026.

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

0

discussions

0

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

The decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Initial findings from a grounded theory studyPMID 22445765Read ↗

Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Decision-making and experiences of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in inherited heart diseases: a qualitative studySemantic proximity Read ↗

How will new genetic technologies, such as gene editing, change reproductive decision-making? Views of high-risk couples.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The decision-making process, experience, and perceptions of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) users.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Decision-Making Process about Prenatal Genetic Screening: How deeply do Moms-to-Be Want to Know from Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing?Semantic proximity Read ↗

The evidence base regarding the experiences of and attitudes to preimplantation genetic diagnosis in prospective parentsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ethical and moral perspectives of individuals who considered/used preimplantation (embryo) genetic testingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Reproductive Decision Support: Preferences and Needs of Couples at Risk for Hereditary Cancer and Clinical Geneticists.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Decision-making on preimplantation genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for couples with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes of high-risk women toward preimplantation genetic diagnosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Pregnancy Planning and Genetic Testing: Exploring Advantages, and ChallengesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Pregnancy Planning and Genetic Testing: Exploring Advantages, and ChallengesSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.