Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Women's thoughts on receiving and sharing genetic information: Considerations for genetic counseling.

Journal of genetic counseling - 1 Dec 2022

Pfledderer Christopher D, Gren Lisa H, Frost Caren J, Andrulis Irene L, Chung Wendy K, Genkinger Jeanine, Glendon Gord, Hopper John L, John Esther M, Southey Melissa, Terry Mary Beth, Daly Mary B

Abstract excerpt

Indications for genetic testing for inherited cancer syndromes are expanding both in the academic and the community setting. However, only a fraction of individuals who are candidates for testing pursue this option. Therefore, it is important to understand those factors that impact the uptake of genetic testing in individuals affected and unaffected with cancer. A successful translation of genomic risk...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Breast Neoplasms

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Communication

Share to Family

Share to Genetic Counseling

Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Share to Genetic Testing

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 35794807
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1599
PMCID: PMC10084347

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Women's thoughts on receiving and sharing genetic information: Considerations for genetic counseling.PMID 35794807Read ↗

Most people share genetic test results with relatives even if the findings are normal: Family communication in a diverse population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

“Is It Worth Knowing?” Focus Group Participants’ Perceived Utility of Genomic Preconception Carrier ScreeningSemantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic testing for susceptibility to breast cancer: findings from women's focus groups.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An exploration of the communication preferences regarding genetic testing in individuals from families with identified breast/ovarian cancer mutations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The effect of knowledge and person-related factors on breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA1/2) testing perception in Turkish women.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Experiences of BRCA1/2 Gene Mutation-Positive Women With Cancer in Communicating Genetic Risk to Their Relatives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Perceptions and care Recommendations from Previvors: Qualitative analysis of female BRCA1/2 mutation Carriers’ experience with genetic testing and counselingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Attitudes, knowledge, risk perceptions and decision-making among women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 and their spouses.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Perspectives of Italian lay persons who would decline genetic risk information: "I think I'd be living in constant worry".Semantic proximity Read ↗

Informational needs of individuals from families harboring BRCA pathogenic variants: A systematic review and content analysis.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Consumer knowledge and opinions of genetic testing for breast cancer risk.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Knowledge about genetic risk for breast cancer and perceptions of genetic testing in a sociodemographically diverse sample.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.