Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular detection assays in use by U.S. veterinary diagnostic laboratories

23 Jul 2021

Abstract excerpt

The continued search for intermediate hosts and potential reservoirs for SARS-CoV2 makes it clear that animal surveillance is critical in outbreak response and prevention. Real-time RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV2 detection can easily be adapted to different host species. U.S. veterinary diagnostic laboratories have used the CDC assays or other national reference laboratory methods to test animal samples. However,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Share to SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Share to Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 34293974
DOI: 10.1177/10406387211029913

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular detection assays in use by U.S. veterinary diagnostic laboratoriesPMID 34293974Read ↗

Second round of the interlaboratory comparison (ILC) exercise of SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection assays being used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the USSemantic proximity Read ↗

Successful Detection of Delta and Omicron Variants of SARS-CoV-2 by Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory Participants in an Interlaboratory Comparison ExerciseSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of eleven in vitro diagnostic assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNASemantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of external quality assessment samples revealed crucial performance differences between commercial RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection when taking extraction methods and real-time-PCR instruments into accountSemantic proximity Read ↗

Analysis of external quality assessment samples revealed crucial performance differences between commercial RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection when taking extraction methods and real-time-PCR instruments into accountSemantic proximity Read ↗

Diagnosing the novel SARS-CoV-2 by quantitative RT-PCR: variations and opportunitiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of four PCR and two point of care assays used in the laboratory detection of SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

Commercially available SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR diagnostic tests need obligatory internal validationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Clinical evaluation of a multiplex RT-PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in individual and pooled upper respiratory tract samplesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Evaluation of Different PCR Assay Formats for Sensitive and Specific Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNASemantic proximity Read ↗

Large-scale implementation of pooled RNA extraction and RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detectionSemantic proximity Read ↗

Resource-efficient internally controlled in-house real-time PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.