Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genetic diversity and selection signatures in maize landraces compared across 50 years of in situ and ex situ conservation.

Heredity - 1 Jun 2021

McLean-Rodríguez Francis Denisse, Costich Denise Elston, Camacho-Villa Tania Carolina, Pè Mario Enrico, Dell'Acqua Matteo

Abstract excerpt

Genomics-based, longitudinal comparisons between ex situ and in situ agrobiodiversity conservation strategies can contribute to a better understanding of their underlying effects. However, landrace designations, ambiguous common names, and gaps in sampling information complicate the identification of matching ex situ and in situ seed lots. Here we report a 50-year longitudinal comparison of the genetic diversity...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Genetic Variation
Share to Genotype

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Mexico

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Zea mays

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 33785893
DOI: 10.1038/s41437-021-00423-y
PMCID: PMC8178342

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genetic diversity and selection signatures in maize landraces compared across 50 years of in situ and ex situ conservation.PMID 33785893Read ↗

Genome-wide SNP genotyping of DNA pools identifies untapped landraces and genomic regions that could enrich the maize breeding poolSemantic proximity Read ↗

Historical genomics of North American maize.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genotyping of DNA pools identifies untapped landraces and genomic regions to develop next-generation varieties.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Independent introductions and admixtures have contributed to adaptation of European maize and its American counterparts.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selective Loss of Diversity in Doubled-Haploid Lines from European Maize Landraces.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Is there an optimum level of diversity in utilization of genetic resources?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effectiveness of in situ and ex situ conservation of crop diversity. What a Phaseolus vulgaris L. landrace case study can tell us.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetic signals of origin, spread, and introgression in a large sample of maize landraces.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparative analysis of genetic diversity and differentiation of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) accessions from two ex situ genebanks.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Supporting in situ conservation of the genetic diversity of crop wild relatives using genomic technologies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

European flint landraces grown in situ reveal adaptive introgression from modern maize.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Molecular Passports for Ex Situ Seed Donors: Enhanced Genetic Monitoring for Plant Conservation.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.