Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

AUCP: An indicator for system effectiveness of panels in pairwise distant kinship identification.

Forensic science international - 1 Nov 2020

Ma Guanju, Cong Bin, Li Shujin

Abstract excerpt

Multiple studies have been done for the identification of pairwise distant kinship and several targeted panels have been constructed. For most of such constructions, pedigree analysis was applied to evaluate the system effectiveness of a certain panel. However, such analyses were hard to be compared to each other and could be affected by many factors, such as sample size and sampling randomness. A new indicator...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Area Under Curve
Share to DNA Fingerprinting
Share to Forensic Genetics

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Gene Frequency

Share to Likelihood Functions

Share to Microsatellite Repeats

Share to Pedigree

Share to ROC Curve

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33142188
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110539

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-06.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

AUCP: An indicator for system effectiveness of panels in pairwise distant kinship identification.PMID 33142188Read ↗

General Formulas for Calculating Commonly Used Kinship Index.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Set up of cutoff thresholds for kinship determination using SNP loci.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Enhancing testing efficacy of high-density SNP microarrays to distinguish pedigrees belonging to the same kinship class.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Establishment of universal algorithms for commonly used kinship indices between two individuals].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Kinship Inferences for Second-Degree Relatives With a Combination of STRs and Microhaplotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving the system power of complex kinship analysis by combining multiple systems.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Resolving kinship degrees with identity-by-descent coefficients: Limits and insights from a simulation study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Exploring the efficacy of paternity and kinship testing based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pairwise kinship testing with microhaplotypes: Can advancements be made in kinship inference with these markers?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Development and evaluation of a novel panel containing 188 microhaplotypes for 2nd-degree kinship testing in the Hebei Han population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

An Application of ITO Analysis in Secondary Kinship Identification.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Calculation of likelihood ratio for X-STR typing in kinship testing].Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.