Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Topics Community

Article

Preferences of Italian patients for return of secondary findings from clinical genome/exome sequencing

3 Nov 2020

Abstract excerpt

Exome/genome sequencing (ES/GS) is increasingly becoming routine in clinical genetic diagnosis, yet issues regarding how to disclose and manage secondary findings (SFs) remain to be addressed, and limited evidence is available on patients' preferences. We carried out semi-structured interviews with 307 individuals undergoing clinical genetic testing to explore their preferences for return of SFs in the...

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 33142017
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1350

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 31 Aug 2026.

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Community interpretation

Discuss the evidence

Ask a question, add context or challenge an interpretation. Community activity is separate from scientific evidence strength.

0

discussions

0

replies

Citations encouraged

Claims remain attributable.

No discussion yet

Be the first to add a careful, cited interpretation.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Preferences of Italian patients for return of secondary findings from clinical genome/exome sequencingPMID 33142017Read ↗

Patient decisions for disclosure of secondary findings among the first 200 individuals undergoing clinical diagnostic exome sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

Views of Genetics Health Professionals on the Return of Genomic ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

A Closer Look at the Recommended Criteria for Disclosing Genetic Results: Perspectives of Medical Genetic Specialists, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Board ChairsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Expression of preference for the disclosure of secondary findings of comprehensive genomic profiling tests by cancer patients and relativesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Informed consent for exome sequencing in diagnostics: exploring first experiences and views of professionals and patientsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Consanguineous couples’ experiences and views regarding expanded carrier screening: Barriers and facilitators in the decision-making processSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parents’ motivations, concerns and understanding of genome sequencing: a qualitative interview studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: a survey studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Additional findings from the 100,000 Genomes Project: A qualitative study of recipient perspectives.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Research Participants’ Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic ResearchSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.