Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Phenotype-dependent habitat choice is too weak to cause assortative mating between Drosophila melanogaster strains differing in light sensitivity.

PloS one - 1 Jan 2020

Peralta-Rincón Juan Ramón, Aoulad Fatima Zohra, Prado Antonio, Edelaar Pim

Abstract excerpt

Matching habitat choice is gaining attention as a mechanism for maintaining biodiversity and driving speciation. It revolves around the idea that individuals select the habitat in which they perceive to obtain greater fitness based on a prior evaluation of their local performance across heterogeneous environments. This results in individuals with similar ecologically relevant traits converging to the same...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Behavior, Animal
Share to Choice Behavior

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Drosophila melanogaster

Share to Drosophila Proteins

Share to Ecosystem

Share to Eye Color

Share to Mating Preference, Animal

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 33057335
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234223
PMCID: PMC7561098

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Phenotype-dependent habitat choice is too weak to cause assortative mating between Drosophila melanogaster strains differing in light sensitivity.PMID 33057335Read ↗

Pupariation site preference within and between Drosophila sibling species.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sexual selection on wing interference patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Strong and weak cross-sex correlations govern the quantitative-genetic architecture of social group choice in Drosophila melanogaster.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sex in a virtual reality: experimental evidence for sexual isolation due to variation in perception of the environmentSemantic proximity Read ↗

Does segregating variation in sexual or microhabitat preferences lead to non-random mating within a population of Drosophila melanogaster?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Egg-laying demand induces aversion of UV light in Drosophila females.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Differential responses to artificial selection on oviposition site preferences in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Local adaptation for body color in Drosophila americana.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Mating success of wild type and sepia mutants Drosophila melanogaster in different choice.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Experimental evidence that matching habitat choice drives local adaptation in a wild population.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Selection of flower color phenotype by contrasting pollinator visual perception in a hybrid zone between two Calceolaria species.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Natural variation in decision-making behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.