Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Mating success of wild type and sepia mutants Drosophila melanogaster in different choice.

Rivista di biologia - 1 Jan 2000

Stanić Snezana, Pavković-Lucic Sofija

Abstract excerpt

Mating behaviour of red-eyed (wt) and brown-eyed (sepia) Drosophila melanogaster was studied under light conditions. Mating success was directly observed in mating vials and techniques usually applied in the studies of sexual selection ("female choice" and "multiple choice"). The comparison of sexual activity of mutant and wild types clearly indicates that they are not equally successful in matings. Sepia eye...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Choice Behavior
Share to Drosophila melanogaster
Share to Eye Color

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy Delete account & data About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Pigmentation

Share to Polymorphism, Genetic

Share to Sex Factors

Share to Sex Ratio

Share to Sexual Behavior, Animal

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 16440285

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-08.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence. Graph snapshot: 2026-09-29.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Mating success of wild type and sepia mutants Drosophila melanogaster in different choice.PMID 16440285Read ↗

Mating activity of yellow and sepia Drosophila willistoni mutants.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Effect of mutation on mating propensity in Drosophila biarmipes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Phenotype-dependent habitat choice is too weak to cause assortative mating between Drosophila melanogaster strains differing in light sensitivity.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dual control by a single gene of secondary sexual characters and mating preferences in medaka.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Direct observation of sexual competition in Drosophila melanogaster: the mutant white in competition with other genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sexual selection on wing interference patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evidence for minority male mating success and minority female mating disadvantage in Drosophila ananassae.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genetics of Drosophila simulans male mating discrimination in crosses with D. melanogaster.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Phototaxis and adaptation of the eyeless Drosophila melanogaster line].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Male mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster: differences in genetic architecture and in relative performance according to female genotype.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Differential responses to artificial selection on oviposition site preferences in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Eye colour as a genetic marker for fertility and fecundity of Triatoma infestans (Klug, 1834) Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.