Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Further evidence that far‐UVC for disinfection is unlikely to cause erythema or pre‐mutagenic DNA lesions in skin

26 May 2020

Abstract excerpt

It is well understood that ultraviolet-C (UVC) radiation is effective for the destruction of micro-organisms and drug-resistant bacteria and is being investigated for its effectiveness at destroying the virus responsible for the current COVID-19 global pandemic.1-4 Far-UVC (200-220 nm) has been proposed as an effective disinfection radiation that is safe to humans.5 In 2014, Woods et al undertook a...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Infection Control and Ventilation
Share to Skin Protection and Aging

Source

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID: 32452563
DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12580

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Further evidence that far‐UVC for disinfection is unlikely to cause erythema or pre‐mutagenic DNA lesions in skinPMID 32452563Read ↗

222 nm far‐ UVC light and skin health: Assessment of DNA damage across different skin typesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Wavelength‐dependent DNA Photodamage in a 3‐D human Skin Model over the Far‐UVC and Germicidal UVC Wavelength Ranges from 215 to 255 nmSemantic proximity Read ↗

Far‐UVC ‐ and UVB ‐induced DNA damage depending on skin typeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Minimal, superficial DNA damage in human skin from filtered far‐ultraviolet CSemantic proximity Read ↗

Different biological effects of exposure to far-UVC (222 nm) and near-UVC (254 nm) irradiationSemantic proximity Read ↗

The UV/Visible Radiation Boundary Region (385–405 nm) Damages Skin Cells and Induces “dark” Cyclobutane Pyrimidine Dimers in Human Skin in vivoSemantic proximity Read ↗

Revisiting the photochemistry of solar UVA in human skinSemantic proximity Read ↗

Fluence-dependent degradation of fibrillar type I collagen by 222 nm far-UVC radiationSemantic proximity Read ↗

UV‐C light: A powerful technique for inactivating microorganisms and the related side effects to the skinSemantic proximity Read ↗

FAR-UV Technology and Germicidal Ultraviolet (GUV) Energy: A Policy and Research Review for Indoor Air Quality and Disease Transmission ControlSemantic proximity Read ↗

UVA1 is skin deep: molecular and clinical implications.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Wavelength-dependent DNA damage induced by single wavelengths of UV-C radiation (215 to 255 nm) in a human cornea modelSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.