Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Should we freeze it? Agreement on fate of borderline blastocysts is poor and does not improve with a modified blastocyst grading system

11 Mar 2020

Abstract excerpt

STUDY QUESTION: What is the inter-observer agreement among embryologists for decision to freeze blastocysts of borderline morphology and can it be improved with a modified grading system? SUMMARY ANSWER: The inter-observer agreement among embryologists deciding whether to freeze blastocysts of marginal morphology was low and was not improved by a modified grading system. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: While previous...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Ovarian function and disorders
Share to Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Share to Reproductive Biology and Fertility

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 32358601
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa060

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 6 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Should we freeze it? Agreement on fate of borderline blastocysts is poor and does not improve with a modified blastocyst grading systemPMID 32358601Read ↗

Blastocyst culture in the Era of PGS and FreezeAlls: Is a ‘C’ a failing grade?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Discard or not discard, that is the question: an international survey across 117 embryologists on the clinical management of borderline quality blastocystsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantationSemantic proximity Read ↗

Prediction of live birth in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles by pre-freeze and post-thaw morphologySemantic proximity Read ↗

Blastocyst quality and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing single blastocyst transfer in frozen cyclesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Outcome of closed blastocyst vitrification in relation to blastocyst quality: evaluation of 759 warming cycles in a single-embryo transfer policySemantic proximity Read ↗

Marked blastomere herniation is the only post-thaw morphological characteristic associated with a reduced pregnancy rate for in vitro produced equine blastocystsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Ultra-Fast Warming Procedure of Vitrified Blastocysts Results in Maintained Embryology and Clinical OutcomesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Embryo fragmentation – Is it really a detrimental factor?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Intra- and interobserver analysis in the morphological assessment of early stage embryos during an IVF procedure: a multicentre studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Double vitrification and warming does not compromise the chance of live birth after single unbiopsied blastocyst transferSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parameters guiding selection of best embryos for transfer after cryopreservation: a reappraisalSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.