Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Relationship between KRAS mutation and diffusion weighted imaging in colorectal liver metastases; Preliminary study.

European journal of radiology - 1 Apr 2020

Gültekin Mehmet Ali, Türk Hacı Mehmet, Beşiroğlu Mehmet, Toprak Hüseyin, Yurtsever Ismail, Yilmaz Temel Fatih, Sharifov Rasul, Uysal Ömer

Abstract excerpt

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate whether there are any differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained from colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) according to Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) gene mutation status. METHOD: In this retrospective study, we included 22 patients with 65 liver metastases due to colorectal cancer and performed KRAS gene mutation tests. We divided the patients into two groups...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Aged
Share to Area Under Curve

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Colorectal Neoplasms

Share to Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Share to Liver Neoplasms

Share to Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Share to ROC Curve

Share to Statistics, Nonparametric

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 32109834
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108895

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Relationship between KRAS mutation and diffusion weighted imaging in colorectal liver metastases; Preliminary study.PMID 32109834Read ↗

Could IVIM and ADC help in predicting the KRAS status in patients with rectal cancer?Semantic proximity Read ↗

The adiposity of CRLM before targeted therapy initiation may serve as a marker to distinguish KRAS mutation status：A retrospective studySemantic proximity Read ↗

Relationship between KRAS mutations and dual time point 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in colorectal liver metastases.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive prediction of KRAS mutation in rectal cancer using hybrid intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis modelSemantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive identification of KRAS mutation in rectal cancer using hybrid intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Non-invasive identification of KRAS mutation in rectal cancer using hybrid intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis modelSemantic proximity Read ↗

Relationship between PET/CT images and KRAS gene mutations in colorectal cancer in Vietnamese patients.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The Utility and Efficiency of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Values to Determine Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutation Status in Brain Metastasis from Lung Adenocarcinoma; A Preliminary Study.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Preoperative Prediction of KRAS Mutation in Rectal Cancer Using a Combined T2-Weighted Imaging Radiomics and Volumetric Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram ModelSemantic proximity Read ↗

Characterizing MRI features of rectal cancers with different KRAS status.Semantic proximity Read ↗

[Comparative Evaluation of the Value of Quantitative Parameters of Dual-energy CT and MRI for KRAS Mutation in Rectal Cancer].Semantic proximity Read ↗

Correlation between KRAS mutation and 18F-FDG uptake in stage IV colorectal cancer.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.