Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Improved ethical guidance for the return of results from psychiatric genomics research.

Molecular psychiatry - 1 Jan 2018

Lázaro-Muñoz G, Farrell M S, Crowley J J, Filmyer D M, Shaughnessy R A, Josiassen R C, Sullivan P F

Abstract excerpt

There is an emerging consensus that genomic researchers should, at a minimum, offer to return to individual participants clinically valid, medically important and medically actionable genomic findings (for example, pathogenic variants in BRCA1) identified in the course of research. However, this is not a common practice in psychiatric genetics research. Furthermore, psychiatry researchers often generate findings...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to BRCA1 gene
Share to Genetic Predisposition to Disease

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Research

Share to Genetic Variation

Share to Genomics

Share to Genomics and Rare Diseases

Share to Guidelines as Topic

Share to Mental Disorders

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 29158581
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2017.228
PMCID: PMC5752587

Genes

BRCA1

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Improved ethical guidance for the return of results from psychiatric genomics research.PMID 29158581Read ↗

Return of Results in a Global Sample of Psychiatric Genetics Researchers: Practices, Attitudes, and KnowledgeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Return of Results in Psychiatric Genetics Research: Perceptions of Best Practices in a Global Sample of Psychiatric Genetics ResearchersSemantic proximity Read ↗

Next generation sequencing in psychiatric research: what study participants need to know about research findings.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Views of Genetics Health Professionals on the Return of Genomic ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

To disclose, or not to disclose? Perspectives of clinical genomics professionals toward returning incidental findings from genomic researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Disclosing incidental findings in genetics contexts: a review of the empirical ethical research.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New NormalSemantic proximity Read ↗

Points-to-consider on the return of results in epigenetic researchSemantic proximity Read ↗

Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!Semantic proximity Read ↗

A Closer Look at the Recommended Criteria for Disclosing Genetic Results: Perspectives of Medical Genetic Specialists, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Board ChairsSemantic proximity Read ↗

The Challenge of Informed Consent and Return of Results in Translational Genomics: Empirical Analysis and RecommendationsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencingSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.