Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Simultaneous fitting of genomic-BLUP and Bayes-C components in a genomic prediction model.

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE - 24 Aug 2017

Iheshiulor Oscar O M, Woolliams John A, Svendsen Morten, Solberg Trygve, Meuwissen Theo H E

Abstract excerpt

BACKGROUND: The rapid adoption of genomic selection is due to two key factors: availability of both high-throughput dense genotyping and statistical methods to estimate and predict breeding values. The development of such methods is still ongoing and, so far, there is no consensus on the best approach. Currently, the linear and non-linear methods for genomic prediction (GP) are treated as distinct approaches. The...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Bayes Theorem
Share to Breeding
Share to Cattle

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genome

Share to Genomics

Share to Genotype

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 28836944
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-017-0339-9
PMCID: PMC5569542

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 4 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Simultaneous fitting of genomic-BLUP and Bayes-C components in a genomic prediction model.PMID 28836944Read ↗

Performance of Bayesian and BLUP alphabets for genomic prediction: analysis, comparison and results.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of genotype imputation on the performance of GBLUP and Bayesian methods for genomic prediction.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Improving Genomic Predictions in Multi-Breed Cattle Populations: A Comparative Analysis of BayesR and GBLUP Models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A fast algorithm for BayesB type of prediction of genome-wide estimates of genetic value.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Single-Step Genomic Evaluations from Theory to Practice: Using SNP Chips and Sequence Data in BLUPF90.Semantic proximity Read ↗

GWABLUP: genome-wide association assisted best linear unbiased prediction of genetic values.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction in French Charolais beef cattle using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic Prediction Using Multi-trait Weighted GBLUP Accounting for Heterogeneous Variances and Covariances Across the Genome.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Application of a Bayesian non-linear model hybrid scheme to sequence data for genomic prediction and QTL mapping.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction in Brazilian Guzerá cattle: application of a single-step approach to productive and reproductive traits.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.