Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Clinical experience of unexpected findings in prenatal array testing.

Biomarkers in medicine - 1 Aug 2016

Joosten Marieke, Diderich Karin Em, Van Opstal Diane, Govaerts Lutgarde Cp, Riedijk Sam R, Prinsen A Krista E, De Vries Femke At, Go Attie Tji, Galjaard Robert-Jan H, Srebniak Malgorzata I

Abstract excerpt

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether unexpected diagnoses (UD) made by prenatal array testing contribute to pregnancy management. PATIENTS & METHODS: In 2010-2015 in 19/4043 (0.5%) pregnancies an UD was made. The clinical usefulness of UDs was assessed based on the couple's responses during post-test counseling and their decisions. RESULTS: In 16/19 cases, the UD was helpful either for the couples...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to DNA Copy Number Variations
Share to Down Syndrome

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genetic Counseling

Share to Gestational Age

Share to Heart Defects, Congenital

Share to Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis

Share to Prenatal Diagnosis

Share to Ultrasonography

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 27414702
DOI: 10.2217/bmm-2016-0054

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 2 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Clinical experience of unexpected findings in prenatal array testing.PMID 27414702Read ↗

Counseling Challenges with Variants of Uncertain Significance and Incidental Findings in Prenatal Genetic Screening and DiagnosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

The introduction of arrays in prenatal diagnosis: A special challengeSemantic proximity Read ↗

Women’s experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing resultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parental experiences of rapid exome sequencing in cases with major ultrasound anomalies during pregnancySemantic proximity Read ↗

Impact of prenatal exome sequencing for fetal genetic diagnosis on maternal psychological outcomes and decisional conflict in a prospective cohortSemantic proximity Read ↗

Dealing with uncertain results from chromosomal microarray and exome sequencing in the prenatal setting: An international cross‐sectional study with healthcare professionalsSemantic proximity Read ↗

“Something Extra on Chromosome 5”: Parents’ Understanding of Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) ResultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Physicians' perspectives on the uncertainties and implications of chromosomal microarray testing of children and familiesSemantic proximity Read ↗

How to deal with uncertainty in prenatal genomics: A systematic review of guidelines and policies.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Pregnancy: Prepare for unexpected prenatal test resultsSemantic proximity Read ↗

Parental motivations for and adaptation to trio‐exome sequencing in a prospective prenatal testing cohort: Beyond the diagnosisSemantic proximity Read ↗

Uterine leiomyoma confounding a noninvasive prenatal test resultSemantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.