Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Genomic Evidence that Sexual Selection Impedes Adaptation to a Novel Environment.

Current biology : CB - 20 Jul 2015

Chenoweth Stephen F, Appleton Nicholas C, Allen Scott L, Rundle Howard D

Abstract excerpt

Sexual selection is widely appreciated for generating remarkable phenotypic diversity, but its contribution to adaptation and the purging of deleterious mutations is unresolved. To provide insight into the impact of sexual selection on naturally segregating polymorphisms across the genome, we previously evolved 12 populations of Drosophila serrata in a novel environment employing a factorial manipulation of the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adaptation, Biological
Share to Drosophila
Share to Environment

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Genome, Insect

Share to Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Share to Selection, Genetic

Source

Identifiers

PMID: 26119752
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.034

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 3 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Genomic Evidence that Sexual Selection Impedes Adaptation to a Novel Environment.PMID 26119752Read ↗

Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Transcriptome-wide effects of sexual selection on the fate of new mutations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in Drosophila melanogaster.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Experimental evolution of a novel sexually antagonistic allele.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sexually antagonistic selection on genetic variation underlying both male and female same-sex sexual behavior.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences.Semantic proximity Read ↗

The genetic consequences of selection in natural populations.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evolutionary genetics: Dissecting a sexually antagonistic polymorphism.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Sexual selection: Changing the definition of the fittest.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations Near Sexually Antagonistic Genes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Natural variation at a single gene generates sexual antagonism across fitness components in Drosophila.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.