Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences.

PLoS biology - 1 Nov 2005

Rundle Howard D, Chenoweth Stephen F, Doughty Paul, Blows Mark W

Abstract excerpt

Mating preferences are common in natural populations, and their divergence among populations is considered an important source of reproductive isolation during speciation. Although mechanisms for the divergence of mating preferences have received substantial theoretical treatment, complementary experimental tests are lacking. We conducted a laboratory evolution experiment, using the fruit fly Drosophila serrata,...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Adaptation, Biological
Share to Analysis of Variance
Share to Drosophila

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Environment

Share to Reproduction

Share to Sex Characteristics

Share to Sex Factors

Share to Sexual Behavior, Animal

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 16231971
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030368
PMCID: PMC1262626

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 7 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-07.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 7 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences.PMID 16231971Read ↗

Genetic constraints on the evolution of mate recognition under natural selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic Evidence that Sexual Selection Impedes Adaptation to a Novel Environment.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Evolutionary experiments on mate recognition in the Drosophila serrata species complex.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Dissecting selection on female mating preferences during secondary contact.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Experimental evolution of mating discrimination in budding yeast.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Testing the correlated response hypothesis for the evolution and maintenance of male mating preferences in Drosophila serrata.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Comparing the intersex genetic correlation for fitness across novel environments in the fruit fly, Drosophila serrata.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection?Semantic proximity Read ↗

Insect mating signal and mate preference phenotypes covary among host plant genotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.