Discover Community Create You

Loading publication...

Noodle always counts identifier-free feature events for service operation. With your permission, Google Analytics can also estimate audience and engagement. Search text, publication identifiers, cookies, IP addresses and browser fingerprints are never included in Noodle's first-party event counters.

Privacy details

Article

Data-driven encoding for quantitative genetic trait prediction.

BMC bioinformatics - 1 Jan 2015

He Dan, Wang Zhanyong, Parida Laxmi

Abstract excerpt

MOTIVATION: Given a set of biallelic molecular markers, such as SNPs, with genotype values on a collection of plant, animal or human samples, the goal of quantitative genetic trait prediction is to predict the quantitative trait values by simultaneously modeling all marker effects. Quantitative genetic trait prediction is usually represented as linear regression models which require quantitative encodings for the...

Read the complete abstract on PubMed

Topics

Share this publication in a Topic to start or enrich a Post.

Share to Alleles
Share to Genetic Markers
Share to Heterozygote

Methodology Data sources Editorial policy Privacy About Contact Helena Bioinformatics

Share to Homozygote

Share to Linear Models

Share to Models, Genetic

Share to Plants

Share to Quantitative Trait, Heritable

Source

Open in PubMed Open full text

Identifiers

PMID: 25707435
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-16-S1-S10
PMCID: PMC4571493

Provenance

PubMed metadata and Literature Corpus relationships. Corpus snapshot updated 5 Sept 2026. Manifest publication-graph-cohort-2026-09-05.1.

Source receipt: pubmed, retrieved 5 Sept 2026.

Related research

Semantic proximity does not establish scientific evidence.

Research trail→

Click a neighbor to travelStep 1 · 12 closest

Data-driven encoding for quantitative genetic trait prediction.PMID 25707435Read ↗

Does encoding matter? A novel view on the quantitative genetic trait prediction problem.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Genomic prediction with epistasis models: on the marker-coding-dependent performance of the extended GBLUP and properties of the categorical epistasis model (CE).Semantic proximity Read ↗

Overview of Genomic Prediction Methods and the Associated Assumptions on the Variance of Marker Effect, and on the Architecture of the Target Trait.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Stacked kinship CNN vs. GBLUP for genomic predictions of additive and complex continuous phenotypesSemantic proximity Read ↗

Stacked kinship CNN vs. GBLUP for genomic predictions of additive and complex continuous phenotypes.Semantic proximity Read ↗

G2PDeep: a web-based deep-learning framework for quantitative phenotype prediction and discovery of genomic markers.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Towards holistic phenotype prediction beyond genotypic data.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Graph-based data selection for the construction of genomic prediction models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Accounting for epistasis improves genomic prediction of phenotypes with univariate and bivariate models across environments.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Multimodality, interaction modeling, and multimodule architectures in genomic prediction: A unified conceptual framework.Semantic proximity Read ↗

Explaining the genetic basis of complex quantitative traits through prediction models.Semantic proximity Read ↗

A review of deep learning applications for genomic selection.Semantic proximity Read ↗

⌁Select a neighboring publication to make it the new centre.